Protected by our machine learning loop on 5B+ annual survey scans.

With 5 billion survey scans annually, we have extensive visibility into fraud patterns across the survey ecosystem. That visibility informs our machine learning loop, helping improve the defenses below, identify risky sources, and protect your study as fieldwork progresses.

Research Defender learning loop across source screening, respondent verification, and response scoring, with outcomes feeding back into source and respondent evaluation.

Protect the study before survey entry

Review technical identity, known fraud history, respondent activity, and external reputation before incoming traffic reaches the questionnaire.

130+ Signal Digital Fingerprint

Every respondent is scanned against more than 130 signals, including hardware specifications, browser data, WebRTC overlays, and fraud history. Session profiles are built in milliseconds to support pre-survey review.

SCANNING RESPONDENT
0%

No-Fly Fraud Suppression List

A daily-updated suppression list checks respondents against known bad actors. A respondent flagged elsewhere in the ecosystem can be blocked before survey entry.

NO-FLY LIST LOOKUP

Hyperactivity Detection

Cross-ecosystem visibility surfaces when a respondent has attempted 30, 50, or more than 100 surveys in a 24-hour period, helping identify unusual survey velocity.

24-HOUR SURVEY ATTEMPTS
Normal Elevated Hyperactive

8 External Reputation Databases

Signals span IP reputation, bot detection, device intelligence, ad fraud, identity verification, proxy detection, browser integrity, and threat intelligence.

CROSS-REFERENCING 8 DATABASES
IP ReputationPending
Bot DetectionPending
Device IntelPending
Ad FraudPending
Identity CheckPending
Proxy / VPNPending
Browser IntegrityPending
Threat IntelPending
VERIFIED No matchFLAGGED0 / 8 checked

Review the responses, not just the entry point

Evaluate response characteristics during or after fieldwork. Each control offers a distinct view for practical quality review.

Open-Ended Score

Evaluate each open-ended answer for relevance, effort, language, AI-generated content, duplicates, nonsensical text, and copy-paste. Responses receive an individual quality score.

EVALUATING OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES

"I love this product because it has many features that I enjoy. The quality is great and I would recommend it to everyone."

"honestly the battery life is what sold me - i had a samsung before and it'd die by 3pm every day. this one lasts til i go to bed"

"good product nice quality"

"The ergonomic design really helps with my carpal tunnel. I switched from a standard mouse and the difference after a week was noticeable in my wrist pain."

Coherence Score

Surface contradictions across a respondent's answers with a specific explanation for each flagged inconsistency, supporting review across question types.

CROSS-ANSWER COHERENCE CHECK

Behavioral Analytics Score

Review keystroke rhythm, pauses between inputs, and typing speed to distinguish natural interaction from bot-generated or copied responses.

Human Typing BehaviorVERIFIED
AI Typing BehaviorFLAGGED

Time Score

Compare each respondent's completion speed with question-level benchmarks. Consistently fast answers can be flagged for review.

QUESTION-LEVEL TIMING COMPARISON
Average Resp. A Resp. B
VERIFIED Respondent A tracks average times closelyFLAGGED Respondent B is consistently speeding

Grid-Question Score

Detect mechanical patterns in grid and matrix questions, including straightlining, diagonal patterns, random clicking, and other non-engaged behavior.

GRID PATTERN DETECTION

How would you rate the quality of our product and service?

123456
Item A
Item B
Item C
Item D
Item E
Item F
Data Points
Answer Pattern
Score
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Start with your Research Platform workflow

Use RepData's Research Platform to connect sample, fieldwork, and quality review in one workflow. Quality evaluation also supports a native Decipher connection, API-based workflows where the survey platform supports the required API, and raw data upload for completed surveys.

Quality by Research Defender

What does Quality by Research Defender include?

It brings together pre-survey fraud prevention and in-survey response quality evaluation. Each addresses a different stage of the research workflow.

What is evaluated before a survey?

Pre-survey screening considers technical and behavioral signals associated with incoming traffic before a respondent enters a study.

What can in-survey quality evaluation review?

Checks can evaluate open-ended responses, coherence across answers, behavioral patterns, response timing, and grid-question patterns.

Does a quality signal automatically remove a response?

Signals support review and study rules. Teams apply quality findings within the workflow and decisions configured for the project.

Discuss the quality workflow that fits

Share your survey setup, existing controls, and what you need to evaluate.

Talk to our team

Trusted by teams who take quality seriously.

Kantar Info Research Austria

[Rep Data] helps us identify and exclude interviews that do not meet our high standards during fieldwork, in an innovative and time-efficient manner. Particularly noteworthy are the click pattern recognition in grid questions and the AI-assisted validation of open-ended responses.

Michael Bieber

Kantar Info Research Austria

Managing Director