Customer outcomes, in their own context.
Search published customer stories by audience, capability, and challenge. Each study remains the source for its original evidence and attribution.
23 stories
Nielsen Sports
Low-quality panel data produced nonsensical results that couldn't be defended. Hard-to-reach segments like young male eSports enthusiasts went unfilled.
24-48 hrs Project turnaround (from 10 days)
Read storyPabst
Pabst needed flexible research methods and reliable consumer feedback without the constraints and cost of its previous tools.
40+ Concepts evaluated in the published customer story
Read storyPearson
Needed highly specific English test takers in targeted regions across India, with zero tolerance for fraudulent participants or bots.
24/7 Global support
Read storyVox Media
Publicly published research cited by millions demanded bulletproof data quality. Any error would damage the reputation of major editorial properties.
4,000+ Quality respondents delivered
Read storyMichigan State University
Ground-breaking academic research targeting niche B2B audiences like global sales managers required data quality that could withstand peer review.
Peer-reviewed Publication-ready quality
Read storyUniversity of Georgia
Graduate research courses needed professional-grade panel access that integrated with Qualtrics and fit academic timelines and budgets.
67 Student projects completed
Read storyBauer Media
Standing behind every survey result meant manually reviewing every single interview, a highly time-consuming and resource-intensive process.
10 hrs Saved on cleaning per tracking wave
Read storyAmplify Snacks
Syndicated data showed what was happening, but Amplify needed to understand why shoppers made their purchase decisions.
Monthly Shopper tracking in the published customer story
Read storyVML
Throwing away 30-50% of survey completes due to bots, disengaged respondents, and unqualified panelists. CPIs were inflated by failed incidence rates.
2% Rejection rate (from 40%+)
Read storyDr. Praeger's
A steady pipeline of product ideas required faster feedback on concepts, packaging, claims, and flavor preferences.
50% Reduction in research turnaround reported in the original story
Read storySimon-Kucher
Niche B2B audiences like point-of-sale software users and robotic process automation buyers were nearly impossible to find through consumer panels.
Phone-verified Niche B2B respondents
Read storySiegel+Gale
Mid-field discovery that respondent pools didn't meet requirements forced sub-optimal data and eroded client trust in brand research.
Flying colors On every quality check
Read storyGoodby Silverstein & Partners
Projects took too long to field, costs were high, and poor project management from vendors caused delayed results and high frustration.
15-20% Cost savings
Read storyUniversity of San Francisco
Student research projects needed flexible, cost-effective access to highly targeted respondents across diverse sectors on a university budget.
60%+ Cost savings
Read storyOutdoor Industry Association
No direct consumer channels to source respondents. Finding participants manually was expensive, slow, and resource-intensive.
20 hrs To 6,000 responses
Read storyRMG Research
Massive amounts of bad data from polls required extensive back-end cleaning, threatening fast-paced weekly reporting deadlines.
<1% Bad data rate
Read storyQuadrant Strategies
Needed automated fraud prevention for in-house data collection serving Fortune 50 clients, without manual data cleaning bottlenecks.
Fortune 50 Clients protected
Read storyClearPath Strategies
Previous providers delivered poor data quality, slow response times, and limited research modes for fast-paced political and technology research.
Voter-matched Sample tied to voter files
Read storyNavigate
DMA-specific sports research required precise click-balancing under event-driven hard deadlines with no room for error.
0 Missed deadlines
Read storyLatitude
Complex video content research needed deeply engaged respondents who would watch 30-60 minutes of content and return for follow-up surveys.
30% Return rate (from 7-8%)
Read storyThe Sound
Sample vendors lacked the project management expertise for granular click-balancing, forcing last-minute scrambles and inflated costs.
Primary Sample provider chosen
Read storyAdvanis
Quality decline in the sample ecosystem led to high volumes of discarded data and extended cleaning cycles across 100+ annual projects.
50% Less cleaning time
Read story(r)evolution
Oversampling, trap questions, and manual review of open ends could no longer keep up with increasingly professional fraud in online samples.
Real time Every interview scored as it completes
Read story